Labor Law, Industrial Relations and Employee Choice
The State of the Workplace in the 1990s
Hearings of the Commission on the Future of Worker-Management Relations
Richard N. Block, John Beck and Daniel H. Kruger, Michigan State
University
Block, Beck and Kruger present detailed examples from the testimony given during the
Commission on the Future of Worker-Management Relations (commonly called the Dunlop
Commission) national and regional hearings. The Commission, by hearing from a wide range of
stakeholders, sought to define the state of industrial relations and labor law in the U.S. during the
1990s. Because the Commission's final reports were concerned with policy matters, they only
briefly summarized the testimony. This volume draws deeply from the testimony, citing many
examples that clearly illustrate the wide variety of relationships between workers and management
today. In addition, it shows how the interpretation of labor law has changed over the decades.
The authors begin with a retrospective of labor law in the U.S. dating back to the National Labor
Relations (Wagner) Act of 1935. Included is the impact of ensuing legislation, several key rulings
by the National Labor Relations Board and the courts, and economic and societal factors that,
together, helped industrial relations evolve into the complex system portrayed during the Dunlop
Commission hearings.
Examples of union and nonunion firms cited during the testimony are presented next, beginning
with firms that respect employees' right to choose. Unionized firms that honored the employees'
right to choose are shown engaging in extensive innovative and cooperative relationships with
unions, often soliciting the unions' input on important decisions. The testimony also shows firms
whose employees chose not to unionize. These worker-management relationships were often
characterized by employee relations systems that created objective or merit-based systems for
making decisions regarding employee relations issues.
The authors also provide examples that reveal how some employers avoid unionization. Firms are
shown taking advantage of the legal process by pyramiding their legal rights to either deter or rid
themselves of unions. Threat, coercion and firings were among tactics used by management
against employees seeking to organize or bargain collectively. Such tactics were used because
firms realized that penalties for this illegal behavior could be delayed indeterminantly through
appeals of NLRB decisions.
|